Why your CRM is lying about marketing ROI
Marketing is so often looking at what's happening up until the deal is created or what's happening when the opportunity cycle is live. And when you have either a stage zero that's actually more of like not really handed off to sales, but it's like sitting in there, it makes it really hard to look at all of the data and all of the engagement layers and say, this is what's happening before we have a real opportunity.
I've worked at a company where RevOps looked at those measurements and said, 'These activities are not driving any revenue,' even though it was, and they went up the chain, CFO, and bypassed marketing, bypassed CMO, and got all the budget pulled for every one of those things with that very bad data, and it was gone.
We should be obsessed with our metrics. We should be able to have a pipeline review or a metrics review in 15 minutes and know exactly what's happening. Because if you try and optimize something based on feeling, you are never going to get where you need to go.
- The term 'lead' is heavily loaded and means different things to different people across various platforms and departments, making consistent tracking difficult.
- Many companies use a 'stage zero' in their opportunity records, which is a place to put potential deals before they are considered 'real opportunities,' leading to a lack of visibility into pre-opportunity activities.
- Focusing solely on the sales user experience in CRM setup often leads to a neglect of the customer journey and potential customer journey, resulting in missed follow-ups for inbound leads interested in other product lines.
- The mechanics of how CRM systems like Salesforce were built, often decades ago, are not designed for how buyers buy today, leading to issues like single lead records not reflecting the full, non-linear buyer journey.
- A common problem is the lack of bidirectional sync between marketing automation platforms (MAP) and CRM, leading to anonymous marketing activities and an inability to connect marketing efforts to pipeline and revenue.
- Many marketing leaders are 'obsessed with bad metrics' and make decisions based on 'feeling' rather than accurate, relevant data, hindering effective optimization of GTM performance.
- The concept of 'path dependency' explains why organizations continue to use outdated systems and processes, even when they are no longer effective, because past decisions constrain current and future options.
- The process of deduplicating records, especially in large organizations with multiple systems, is often manual and extremely time-consuming, leading to increased costs and inaccurate segmentation.
- 14.5% (Percentage of pipeline that had a trackable marketing touchpoint in an active sales cycle over the last 4.5 quarters for a high ACV, low volume business.)
- 85% (Percentage of pipeline for the same company where marketing could not see any activity, indicating anonymous engagement.)
RevBots.ai View:
- Classic SaaS Hoarder behavior: bolting on stage zero instead of fixing data architecture.
- Marketing teams stuck in path dependency need ARM's unified data layer.
- Anonymous engagement metrics scream for ARM's identity resolution capabilities.
- Tab Hoppers manually deduping records waste 20% of ops time (ARM benchmark).
Join The RevBots ARMy
The insider daily for Autonomous Revenue Masters.